Regionalisation: what next?
“Regional collaboration is not an end in itself but a means to delivering services more effectively and efficiently in order to improve the quality of health and disability services in a sustainable manner.” So read’th the latest document from the DHB CEO group reporting on a shared DHB understanding of ‘regionalisation’.
The document goes on to report that the purpose of regionalisation is to achieve improvement through:
- Standardisation of clinical practice or administrative functions
- Shared best practice
- Optimal utilisation of scarce resources, e.g. workforce, equipment, facilities etc.
- Greater clinical and management focus on key issues
Reinforcing that it is does not describe simply a better coordination of services
or the simple aggregation or coexistence of services. Guiding principles are applied differently for administrative versus clinical services. Administrative services would need to be delivered at lower cost, and more efficiently and effectively whilst for clinical services the principles are that patient outcomes can be demonstrably improved, services made more sustainable by developing greater critical mass and that the right care should be delivered in the right place at the right time.
Admirable so far some may think, but what does it mean for us? Inevitably the document concedes, regionalisation will mean a degree of centralisation, noting that the central region has coined the phrase “one region, one population, one plan”. Reorganisation of services and increased mobility of staff to service the areas who have lost direct delivery, are two obvious implications.
But what about 20 DHBs, 20 budgets and 20 populations? A key problem identified in the paper is “…that DHBs when taking decisions regionally have difficulty in making decisions that, when considered in isolation, may not be the best option for their DHB”. In fact the budgetary drivers for DHBs remain confined to each 20 alone. The paper proffers the view that if the needs of the regional population are taken into account, all DHB populations will receive greater benefit over a period of time, even if they do not for each individual decision. A bit of a leap of faith there we would suggest. If small clinically unsustainable services are centralised, it is probably that small or limited workforce issues could be addressed but how does that balance up against the right care in the right place at the right time? Many have understood this catch cry to mean as close to the patient as possible – but it can be read differently.
In order to ensure regionalisation proceeds it is suggested DHBs agree a joint mechanism for pooling sovereignty where 100% agreement may not be required for all decisions in all regions and where there is no opt out after agreement – wow, you would want to be on your toes on this front. Does this mean that if South Canterbury doesn’t agree but Canterbury gets Southern on side, too bad for Timaru?
The full paper is on the APEX website (‘News’ tab) for those that wish to read more. We suggest hoping this is going to “go away” will not be a successful strategy. The Minister, apparently too shy to come out and just amalgamate DHBs, is using the legislative directive to “encourage” collaboration to seriously push regionalisation. We have regional training hubs; he will have regional service delivery models.
Welcome
To the Northland DHB Anaesthetic Technicians, who have recently joined APEX.
Better, sooner, more convenient – or not?”
Or possibly more pressure on an under resourced service to provide service at the least convenience for the employee? BSMC – the message rings in our ears with the Ministry of Health (MOH) expounding these virtues and their health targets on one hand, whilst zero rating funding and budgets with the other. There is even data available for you and the public to track how well your DHB is performing in each of the target areas: click here to find out more.
Missing from this potpourri of media releases and glossy flyers is the cost to the health professionals who perform the services required to achieve these targets. Indeed, DHB language increasingly implies The Board provides to patients itself, even the Board Chair personally, missing out the obvious link between staff delivering the care to patients so the DHB is able to meet its target.
We are all too familiar with the belt tightening of the DHBs poured out on the intranet and in the media, woeful tales of the need to pull together to maintain service at the current levels whilst putting freezes on recruitment, overtime bans, salary caps and in the latest newsletter to all staff at ADHB the suggestion that your already under resourced department can spare you to take some of your excess Annual Leave. With whispers in the wind from the powers that be, that after July there will be 0% on the table to offer for any further collectives. The mind boggles!
So how do we cope with this?
It won’t be easy. Firstly, let us know immediately if you feel you, your colleagues or patient’s safety is being endangered by staff shortages or unreasonable service demands. Remember that stress and fatigue are safety issues. Ensure that you and your colleagues aren’t working for “love”; some tips…. Don’t mask your staff shortage by working through breaks including shifting QA or CPD activities into your meal breaks! Breaks are necessary to keep you fresh and able to perform adequately; fatigued employees perform less well, are less productive and become less engaged and committed to their work. In the long term this is counterproductive to you, your patients and quite frankly the service your employer is trying to deliver. Whilst the
DHBs may be focused solely on achieving budget by June (read ADHB here), you need to ensure they are reminded there is more to delivering a safe, quality standard of care than meeting budget. Don’t start early or finish late without claiming overtime. Not only are you selling yourself short both financially and in terms of work life balance, but you are negating the triggers we have in health that send messages to management. Increasing overtime means inadequate staff – and to the contrary no increasing overtime means everything is fine.
We know that you feel responsible for the service, and you have the patient’s best interests at heart, however delivering service is a joint responsibility between you and your employer, not a one-sided affair. The employer needs to provide adequate resources to enable the desired level of service, or face up to the growing amount of evidence that an increase in resources or reduction in services will be needed.
This leads us on to… don’t race through your work to compensate for lack of staffing. There are protocols to follow for a reason; these accredited processes ensure quality of procedure and result. When we are under pressure and under staffed we appreciate the temptation to cut corners or maybe not follow procedures to the letter, but this is when mistakes occur. The patient will not thank you for this – especially in the case of a sentinel event and nor will your manager or the disciplinary panel.
As health professionals we must ensure our integrity by the standards we maintain and the quality of our work.
A question
No doubt as controversy swirled around the Banks-Dotcom affair, a recent newspaper article stated that some unions’ fees are directed to Labour Party coffers, subsequently raising a question by a member about whether any of the APEX membership fee was spent in this manner.
In short, it is not. APEX holds the view that we can only be beholden to one master, the members. To be affiliated to any third party runs the risk that conflict could arise with that primary purpose.
Delegate training
Delegates have just completed three days of training in Auckland, and are now armed with a few more tools to assist you back in the workplace.
Topics covered during the training included, tools for the new delegate, salary progression, Registration boards, Clinical Governance, How to manage the poorly performing Employer, the Employment Relations Act, and expanding Scopes of Practice, with opportunities to network with other members of their occupational group as well as other professions from the same employer. We would say their time was well spent with plenty of work, however there were also social opportunities with a field trip and BBQ at the Union office and a fancy dressed theme dinner.
For copies of the speakers notes, and other information shared at Delegate Training, please click here.
APEX AGM
The 2012 AGM will be held at 12.30 on August 14 in Auckland (venue TBC closer to the time). All members are welcome to attend the AGM however even if you are not coming in person there are some things you still might want to know. So first off the Agenda will be placed on the website by the end of May. If there is anything you wish to raise, please email our National Secretary at secretary@apex.org.nz for assistance.
Also this is the time when we confirm the election of our national executive members, who are charged with running APEX between AGMs and is made up of three national office holders and the Presidents of all the Divisions of APEX.
The three national office holders are elected for a 2 year term; the positions of National President (currently held by Peter Gene) and Secretary (currently held by Deborah Powell) are up for election this year. By contrast the Presidents of the APEX Divisions are incumbent until the resign, retire or (we hope not – but union rules do tend to cover such possibilities) die. Each division also elects a secretary who can stand in for the President on the national executive. Current vacancies that need to be filled include:
A President for the following Divisions:
- Managers
- IT
- Dietitians
- Social Workers
A Secretary for the following Divisions:
- Physiologists
- Dental Therapists
- Anaesthetic Technicians
- Pharmacists
- Managers
- IT
- Dietitians
- Social Workers.
Nomination forms are also on the website on the National Exec page and should be forwarded to Dennis Dixon-McIver at the APEX office no later than 0900 on 13 July 2012.
Delegate’s Column: Hannah Weakley
Hi, my name is Hannah Weakley. I am a Clinical Community Dietitian working for Northland District Health Board, and am one of three Dietitian delegates.
Dietitians are one of the newest professions to join APEX, with our decision to move based on the identification of a need for a specific Dietitian collective to improve the conditions under which we work, and to increase the recognition associated with our specialist roles. This move has been a collective one, with all Northland DHB Dietitians opting to join APEX.
It is very early days at this stage, but we are confident that gains can be made, even within the tight health budget.
So, what do Dietitians do?
No, we don’t just tell patients to eat their greens, and we are not the “food police”.
We are a group of registered clinicians who conduct nutritional assessment and carry out medical nutrition therapy. Dietitians apply scientific knowledge about food and nutrition to individuals and groups in states of health and disease to promote optimal health outcomes within the social, economic and cultural context of the New Zealand population. Dietitians in Northland are service-based; we each provide specialist dietetic support within our respective multidisciplinary teams. We have had some exciting developments within our profession over the last 18 months, with the addition of prescribing oral nutritional supplements, some vitamins and minerals and oral rehydration solutions to our scope of practice if we wish.
We are a small group, but we are strong, and we look forward to working with APEX to improve our terms and conditions through a Dietitian Collective employment agreement. I look forward to meeting other professional groups within the APEX circles.
Tip
Since April 2011, employers have been able to ask for a sickness certificate even if they have no reason to suspect you weren’t sick. They do have to pay the costs however.
Download: To the point April 2012 issue




